The Planning Phase focuses principally on required project planning work. Proper comprehensive project planning is essential to a successful IT project, and incomplete project planning and analysis are frequently root causes of project failure. Most project planning is conducted as part of the PMBOK Integration Management work, which includes defining the processes necessary to identify, define, combine, unify, and coordinate all project activities for successful project deployment.
1.0: Objectives / Goals
2.0: Deliverables and Approvals
4.0: Tasks and Activities
Successful completion of the Planning Phase should comprise:
The purpose of the Planning Phase is to plan all project processes and activities required to ensure project success and to create a comprehensive set of plans, known as the PMP, to manage the project from this phase until project termination. During the Requirements Analysis Phase, the agency will conduct any procurement needed for the project.
Back To Top
SDLC deliverables help State agencies successfully plan, execute, and control agency IT projects by providing a framework to ensure that all aspects of the project are properly and consistently defined, planned, and communicated. The SDLC document templates provide a clear structure of required content along with boilerplate language agencies may utilize and customize. State agencies may use formats other than the templates, as long as the deliverables include all required content.
The development and distribution of SDLC deliverables:
During the development of documentation, the Planning Team should:
Write comprehensive, easy to understand documents with no redundant information.
The following is a listing of deliverables required of all projects for this phase of work.
Project Management Plan –
· Scope Management Plan
· Schedule Management Plan
· Cost Management Plan
· Quality Management Plan
· Staffing Management Plan
· Communication Management Plan
· Risk Management Plan
· Procurement Management Plan
· Change Management Plan
· Define how the project is executed, monitored, controlled, and closed
· Document all actions necessary to execute, monitor, control, and close the project
Procurement Documents – documents such as a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a Task Order Request for Proposal (TORFP) that elicit competitive and comprehensive offers from potential contractors for a product or service. The document should specify the scope of the desired procurement, define the evaluation process, and delineate the deliverables and requirements associated with the project.
· Elicit quality proposals from qualified contractors
· Provide contractors with sufficient information to formulate an appropriate response including an accurate schedule and cost estimate
All deliverables other than those identified as Updates should be initially developed in this phase. Deliverables identified as Updates should be revisited and enhanced as necessary as prescribed in this phase.
Deliverables produced during this phase must be reviewed in detail and should follow the approval path as defined in the above table. A signature page or section should accompany each deliverable requiring approval. DoIT will periodically request copies of these documents as part of its oversight responsibilities.
The following personnel participate in the work activities during this phase:
Responsible – Describes role that executes the activities to achieve the task.
Accountable – Describes roles that own the quality of the deliverable and sign off on work that Responsible provides.
Consulted – Describes roles that provide subject matter expertise.
Informed – Describes roles that receive information about the task.
The Roles and Responsibilities page has detailed descriptions of these roles and the associated responsibilities.
The Project Manager ensures the following prerequisites for this phase are complete:
After completing the first three phases of the SDLC, agencies can select from one of several development paths suited to the specific project. By selecting the appropriate development path, an agency can reduce documentation redundancy. These development paths are as follows:
The Planning Team begins planning with the following tasks:
The Project Manager conducts and/or supervises the analysis required to understand all the dimensions of the project and documents this analysis in the PMP and its subsidiary plans. The Project Manager may assign some investigation and analysis tasks to other agency staff or members of the Planning Team.
The key elements of the PMP include:
The PMP must include the following subsidiary plans:
All vendor-produced project plans must include the proper schedule and activity for creating, reviewing, revising, and accepting all required SDLC documentation.
Throughout the life cycle review all planning processes regularly and revise as needed to ensure continued applicability. Also, review and update the PMP and subsidiary plans at least quarterly.
The Project Manager with input from the key project stakeholders writes the Scope Management Plan and then creates the milestone list. The Scope Management Plan briefly reiterates the project scope, defines its verification and control procedures, and describes how requirements will be defined. The Scope Management Plan must address the following scope management processes: Collect Requirements, Verify Scope, and Control Scope.
Collect Requirements – a process identifying how requirements will be further defined. Identify the requirements definition methodology, tools, techniques, and documentation to be utilized and the planned processes to ensure that requirements are defined to be complete, concise, consistent, and unambiguous. This section should clearly demonstrate how the Planning Team will define and validate requirements for all requirement types specified in the Functional Requirements Document template.
Verify Scope – a process defining how various products/deliverables will be periodically verified and formally accepted. This section of the Scope Management Plan should describe:
Control Scope – procedures for handling project change requests.
The Project Manager, with input from the key project stakeholders and initialWBS, refines the WBS into further detail, develops the baseline schedule and defines the Schedule Management Plan. The initial WBS, developed during the Concept Development Phase, will be progressively elaborated to define specific work activities, activities sequence, estimate resources, and estimate duration that will need to complete the project. The refined WBS will be used to develop an initial, baseline schedule. The Schedule Management Plan establishes the specific procedures for how the project schedule will be managed and controlled and is as detailed as necessary to control the schedule through the life cycle based on the size, risk profile, and complexity of the project. The Project Manager should consider the six schedule management processes described below in the development of the schedule baseline and the Schedule Management Plan. The development of the schedule baseline will involve activity definition, activity sequencing, activity resource estimation, and activity duration estimation. The Schedule Management Plan should be focused on the methods for controlling the schedule.
Define Activities – identification of the specific work activities that need to be performed to complete the project. Although preliminary activity definition begins in the Concept Development Phase, this definition is further refined during the Planning Phase to ensure that all activities are defined in detail. The Planning Team creates a more detailed WBS, develop an initial, baseline project schedule and describes the proposed process for how the baseline schedule will be maintained and monitored in the Schedule Management Plan.
The Project Manager includes IV&V processes as discrete WBS work tasks if the project is subject to IV&V review.
Other WBS considerations include:
Sequence Activities – identification of WBS dependencies and order among activities. Identify and document the logical relationships among schedule activities.
Estimate Activity Resources – estimation of the type and quantities of resources required to complete identified activities.
Estimate Activity Durations – estimation of the approximate duration to complete work packages. Using the refined WBS, the team members most familiar with the identified work package should estimate the duration of scheduled activities.
Develop Schedule – develop the baseline project schedule after analyzing all defined WBS activities and work packages, sequence, resources, and duration. This section also includes identification of tools to use for managing the project schedule.
Control Schedule – methods for controlling changes to the schedule.
The agency must manage the master project schedule, including both agency and contractor tasks. As such, it is critical that the Schedule Management Plan identify planned master schedule management activities to be executed throughout the project life cycle.
The Project Manager and the Procurement Officer create the cost baseline and the Cost Management Plan. Beginning with the preliminary cost estimates identified in the Concept Development Phase, the Project Manager develops updated cost estimates to perform the work included in the updated schedule. The Cost Management Plan establishes the activities and criteria for planning, structuring, and controlling project costs. Cost estimating and cost controls are the most important evaluation and control items in State projects. Costs and cost variances must be reported regularly to DoIT and other oversight organizations. Any cost change over five percent requires legislative approval.
The Project Manager should consider the three cost management processes described below in the development of the cost baseline and the Cost Management Plan. The development of the cost baseline will involve updated cost estimation and budget determination. The Cost Management Plan should be focused on the methods for controlling costs.
Estimate Costs – development of a complete estimate of the funding needed to complete project activities, including operations, maintenance, and support costs for the life of the project. See Section 4.5 of the Concept Development Phase for information on various cost estimating methods. Estimate costs by evaluating each WBS work package, and logically partition and report costs into incremental, manageable pieces, including:
Determine Budget – combination of work package costs to establish an overall budget. Aggregate the estimated costs of each scheduled activity or work package, and establish a total cost performance baseline for measuring project performance. When aggregating the estimated costs, add a budget line item for IV&V (see ITPR Guidelines and Instructions for estimated IV&V costs). Not all projects are selected for IV&V reviews, but cost allocations for the activity are advisable for all MITDPs. Also consider:
Control Costs – establishment of procedures to manage the established cost baseline, so the project is completed on time and on budget. These procedures assist in assuring that cost expenditures do not exceed the authorized funding, by period, deliverable, or in total.
Planned cost control activities must address the following:
The Cost Management Plan should identify how the team will update other relevant project documents (e.g. PMP) when cost variances are identified.
When identifying cost performance monitoring plans, consider performance measurement techniques identified by PMBOK. For example, PMBOK, Chapter 7 describes earned value techniques which compare the budgeted cost of work performed to both the budgeted cost of work scheduled and the actual cost of work performed.
Ensure that planned financial reporting for MITDPs adheres to the DoIT quarterly reporting guidelines.
The Project Manager with input from key project stakeholders and the Procurement Officer creates the Quality Management Plan and the quality baseline, which identify the relevant quality standards and determine how those standards will be satisfied. The Quality Management Plan should address three quality management processes: plan quality, perform quality assurance, perform quality control.
Plan Quality – verification processes to ensure that the system is successful, that project stakeholders are satisfied, and that deliverables are accepted.
Perform Quality Assurance –procedures for ensuring the effectiveness of quality management processes and quality standards. This section of the Quality Management Plan describes how and when the team will monitor and report effectiveness and how the team will implement corrective actions to ensure that quality management processes and standards are defined and implemented to ensure optimal project performance.
Perform Quality Control – review activities focused on the quality of deliverables, including the system, to determine adherence to quality standards and criteria. This section of the Quality Management Plan describes the procedures for evaluating deliverable and project performance and for recommending necessary changes. Quality control procedures should address monitoring overall project performance, including cost and schedule performance, as well as the quality of all project activities and deliverables. Quality control activities for the system should identify the testing activities, tools, techniques, and desired outputs to ensure quality attributes are built into the design and tested throughout the life cycle. Quality control tools and techniques may include quality inspections, inspection schedules, and quality audits, and outputs may include bug fix logs of inspection errors referenced against a Requirements Traceability Matrix. Testing is an ongoing activity that can provide an early warning long before an application is released into production if it is not up to standard.
The Project Manager with input from key project stakeholders creates the Staffing Management Plan and the Resource Calendar. Staffing Management Planning further determines:
The Staffing Management Plan elaborates on staffing work completed in the Concept Development Phase – the preliminary organization chart, RAM, and preliminary staffing estimates – by describing how and when human resource requirements will be met.
The Staffing Management Plan will contain for each team member:
A Staffing Management Plan contains:
A Staffing Management Plan must consider resource needs for the full life of the system including operations and maintenance. Because internal agency resources assigned to the project will no longer be able to perform their operational duties, the Staffing Management Plan should identify the additional resources required to support agency operations without interruption.
Additional optional areas of the Staffing Management Plan include:
The Project Manager with input from key project stakeholders develops the Communication Management Plan. Communications planning is one of the most important subsidiary plans in the PMP. It describes the processes required to ensure timely and appropriate generation, collection, distribution, storage, retrieval, and disposition of project information. For more information on communications planning, see PMBOK, Chapter 10, fourth edition.
The Communication Management Plan describes the detailed processes and techniques the team will use to collect, store, and report on project progress. It is often multi-dimensional; as there are multiple stakeholder groups that require information on the project, the Communication Management Plan details who needs exactly what information, when they need it, how it will be delivered, and by whom.
The Communication Management Plan is an important first step in managing project stakeholders’ expectations, which is an important factor in project success. The Project Manager is primarily responsible for ensuring that project communications is conducted appropriately throughout the project, but the work of disseminating information can be delegated to other team members.
Consider DoIT a key stakeholder when developing the Communication Management Plan. Align project status reports with the data needs of DoIT and the Clarity portfolio management application. For information on Clarity reporting requirements, contact DoIT.
Key elements of the Communication Management Plan include:
Project performance reporting involves collecting all project baseline data and distributing performance information to project stakeholders. Performance reporting (i.e. status reporting) generally provides information on scope, schedule, cost, quality, issues, and risks, completed activities within the reporting period, activities that have not been completed and why, upcoming activities, and a list of pending, approved, and rejected project changes.
The Project Manager with input from key project stakeholders creates the Risk Management Plan and the Risk Register, which detail how teams will identify, manage, and mitigate risk. For RMP template, visit the SDLC Templates page. Active management of project risks increases the probability of positive events and decreases the chances of negative events within the project life cycle. This subject is described in detail in Chapter 11.1 of the PMBOK guide.
Developing a Risk Management Plan during the Planning Phase reinforces the concept that risk identification and mitigation are highly important activities, which, if properly addressed, serve to reduce overall project risk. Whenever practical, involve the Executive Sponsor and the Project Sponsor in risk identification and mitigation activities throughout the project life cycle. Identify in the Risk Management Plan how the Project Manager will routinely provide the Executive Sponsor and the Project Sponsor with complete insight into all known risks.
Be sure to give special consideration to security risks and the processes for evaluating whether the system meets state security standards.
DoIT maintains a system of five risk categories and 12 to 15 sub-categories. These risk classification values are included in the Risk Management Plan template. When developing a Risk Management Plan, use this classification schema for easier project reporting throughout the life cycle.
Key elements of the Risk Management Plan include:
A Risk Management Plan typically contains the following sections:
An RMP also includes an issue management plan with an actively managed issues log that identifies, assigns responsibility, and tracks issues through to closure.
The Project Manager and the Procurement Officer create the Procurement Management Plan to define the procedures to purchase or acquire all products and services needed from outside the team to perform project tasks. The Project Procurement Management processes include six key steps. For more detailed information, please refer to Chapter 12 in the PMBOK, fourth edition. The Project Manager should update the schedule to include all procurement activities identified as part of procurement management planning. For an example procurement schedule the DoIT website.
The Procurement Management Plan should identify plans for the following procurement management processes:
Plan Purchases and Acquisitions – development of solicitation documents to seek responses from multiple businesses that wish to provide a needed service for the agency. These documents must have sufficient detail and concrete measurable criteria to ensure consistent, comparable bidder responses but also be flexible enough to allow consideration of contractor suggestions for better ways to satisfy the requirements. If an agency elects to have contractors conduct some SDLC activities, the contractor must be explicitly instructed in procurement documents to describe the methods it will use to develop SDLC documents, supply all pertinent SDLC document samples with the bid packages, and supply a schedule for when these key documents would be received. It is also good policy to fix price deliverables and provide detailed acceptance criteria in advance in order to avoid later confusion and cost overruns.
Plan Contracting – development and preparation of documents needed to support the Request Vendor/Contractor responses process and the Select Vendor/Contractor process.
Request Vendor/Contractor Responses – release of a RFP or TORFP
Select Vendor/Contractors (proposal evaluation process) – receipt of bids, quotes, or proposals and application of pre-determined, published evaluation criteria to select qualified contractors or sellers. Evaluation criteria varies based on overall project needs. Key project stakeholders should be involved in evaluating all aspects of proposed solutions from a technical perspective.
Contract Administration – verification that the contractor meets contractual requirements and performs in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreed contract. The five key areas of contract management include:
Contract Closure – establishment of procedures to verify and document project deliverables and formalize the Project Sponsor’s acceptance of those deliverables. If the project is cancelled, the Project Manager documents the reasons and obtains sign-off from the Project Sponsor. Also, determine processes for the contract and administrative close-out in this part of the PMP. Refer to PMBOK, section 4.6 for further direction.
Involve key project stakeholders in determining effective acceptance practices for project deliverables. Use a RTM to verify deliverables have met contractual standards. After the key project stakeholders verify the deliverable meets the requirement, the Project Manager executes formal acceptance.
The Project Manager with input from the Procurement Officer creates the Change Management Plan, which documents how project changes will be monitored and controlled from project inception through completion. The Change Management Plan should address:
When appropriate, agencies may develop other planning documents, such as:
The Procurement Officer with the assistance of the Project Manager develops all procurement documents. For hardware/network projects, agencies may choose to procure vendor support for planning and requirements definition activities. Procurements during the Planning Phase should not involve the acquisition of hardware, because the requirements have not yet been defined and the system has not yet been designed. Depending on the scope of service solicited, procurement documents may be developed in other SDLC phases.
Procurement documents such as RFPs and TORFPs are distributed to elicit competitive and comprehensive offers from potential contractors for a product or service. RFPs and TORFPs specify the scope of the desired procurement, define the evaluation process, delineate the deliverables and requirements associated with the project, and establish a contractual agreement for the delivery of the good or service. Careful planning and development of procurement documents help avoid or mitigate project risks or transfer project risks to the contractor.
The Procurement Officer determines the type of contract and solicitation. The type of contract determines the level of risk shared between the State and a contractor. Fixed-price contracts generally reduce the risk to the State by ensuring that any cost increase due to adverse performance is the responsibility of the contractor, who is legally obligated to complete the project. FP agreements should tie contractor payments to the completion and agency acceptance of project deliverables. A FP contract is best used when the service or product to be developed is fully defined before the start of work. Time-and-materials contract types are more appropriate for level of effort engagements or projects with significant unknowns. The PMBOK, fourth edition, section 12.1.2, further discusses FP, T&M, and other contract types.
The Procurement Officer also determines the type of solicitation:
Agencies are encouraged but not required to use statewide contract vehicles such as Consulting and Technical Services (CATS).
The Procurement Officer with the Project Manager writes the SOW, which defines the project boundaries. One of the most critical parts of a procurement document, the SOW describes in detail the project deliverables, deliverable requirements, and the work required to create those deliverables. Agencies should leverage the information in the PSS to ensure consistency. The level of quality, specificity, and completeness of the SOW significantly impacts the quality and overall success of the project throughout its life cycle.
A well-written SOW:
For CATS TORFPs refer to the CATS TORFP Master Template on DoIT’s website for instructions regarding requirements for SOW development.
The Business Owner and Project Manager with input from the Agency CIO develop the proposal evaluation criteria to rate proposals. The proposal evaluation criteria should be specific, objective, and repeatable and must be included in the RFP, so offerors know how the State will evaluate their proposals and under which criteria the winner will be awarded a contract or task order. Considerations for proposal evaluation criteria include:
The PMBOK, fourth edition, provides the following example evaluation criteria:
Additional guidance can be found on DoIT’s website in these documents:
The PMBOK, fourth edition, section 126.96.36.199, provides further guidance regarding proposal evaluation and source selection criteria.
The Procurement Officer with the assistance of the Planning Team develops the RFP after the SOW is finalized.
The RFP is an invitation to contractors to submit a proposal to provide specific services, products, and deliverables.
The key elements of an RFP include at minimum:
RFPs and TORFPs should:
All RFPs and TORFPs must explicitly require complete compliance with the State of Maryland SDLC and other policies and guidelines. Specifically, each TORFP must include the following language:
The TO Contractor(s) shall be required to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, policies, standards and guidelines affecting information technology projects, which may be created or changed periodically. The TO Contractor(s) shall adhere to and remain abreast of current, new, and revised laws, regulations, policies, standards and guidelines affecting project execution. The following policies, guidelines and methodologies can be found at www.doit.maryland.gov. Select “Contractor” and “IT Policies, Standards and Guidelines”.
These may include, but are not limited to:
A. The nine project management knowledge areas in the Project Management Institute’s (PMI) Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). The TO Contractor(s) shall follow the project management methodologies that are consistent with the most recent edition of the PMBOK Guide. TO Contractor’s staff and subcontractors are to follow a consistent methodology for all TO activities.
B. The State’s SDLC methodology at: www.doit.maryland.gov - keyword: SDLC.
C. The State’s IT Security Policy and Standards at: www.doit.maryland.gov - keyword: Security Policy.
D. The State’s IT Project Oversight at: www.doit.maryland.gov - keyword: IT Project Oversight.
E. The State’s of Maryland Enterprise Architecture at www.doit.maryland.gov- keyword: MTAF (Maryland Technical Architecture Framework).
F. Nonvisual Access Clause for Information Technology Procurements at www.doit.maryland.gov– keyword: Nonvisual Access
All RFPs and TORFPs must explicitly require contractors who propose alternative methodologies to include an SDLC compliance approach, which describes in detail how they will comply with all SDLC requirements, in their proposals.
Additional guidance can be found on DoIT’s website in:
The Procurement Officer and Project Manager solicit input from the Agency CIO and Business Sponsor and designate agency personnel and end users for the Agency Evaluation Committee (AEC). AEC staff should include:
The AEC follows a formal evaluation process to review and select the contractor using the evaluation method and evaluation criteria defined earlier. Under the guidance of the Procurement Officer, the AEC evaluates each proposal according to all applicable State laws and regulations. The AEC determines technical ratings based on the evaluation criteria outlined in the RFP/TORFP. After the technical rankings, the Procurement Officer forwards financial proposals for each qualified proposal to the AEC. The AEC establishes the financial rankings and determines the combined technical and financial ranking of each qualified proposal. Based on these rankings, the AEC recommends an awardee based on best value.
Specific procedures for CATS Task Order contractor selection and award are included on the CATS TORFP Preparation, Solicitation, and Award Process web page and the CATS I State ADPICS Processing Procedures document. Refer to these documents and others on DoIT’s website.
The Project Manager and the Planning Team prepare and present a project status review for the Agency CIO, Project Sponsor, Executive Sponsor, and other project stakeholders after completing all Planning Phase tasks. This review addresses the following:
The Project Manager must obtain deliverable approval signatures before proceeding to the Requirements Analysis Phase.
Update the project documentation repository upon completion of the phase-closure activities.
The approval of the PMP, the execution of the Planning project status review, and the approval to proceed to the next phase signify the end of the Planning Phase.
45 Calvert Street, Annapolis, MD 21401
300-301 West Preston Street, Baltimore MD 21201
Toll Free: 877.634.6361