The four elements of the State's Oversight Methodology for approved information technology (IT) projects:
- Professional Project Management
- Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V)
- Portfolio Review
- Peer Review
For complete information, see the State's IT Master Plan.
Professional Project Management
- Full implementation of best practices for all major IT development projects (MITDPs):
- Improve control of cost, scope and schedule
back to top
Independent Verification & Validation
- Project assessments conducted by third party contractors
- Assessment examples:
- Risk Management
- Governance
- Requirements
- Readiness for implementation or next phase
- Return on Investment
- Project Management Capabilities
back to top
Portfolio Reviews
- Review each major IT project at least once a year
- Review all current and proposed major IT projects to:
- Ensure mutual understanding of objectives
- Monitor the overall project plans and intended expenditures
- Improve analysis of cost, scope and schedule
- Opportunity to acknowledge successful completions
- Opportunity to flag any anticipated issues
- Periodically include the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) Project Management Office (PMO) project manager in project update meetings;
- Report formally to DoIT PMO on project progress promptly each quarter
back to top
Peer Review Committees (PRC)
- PRC members are comprised of Chief Information Officers and project managers from an average of approximately five State agencies other than the MITDP agency
- Each new MITDP is assigned a PRC
back to top
What Does the PRC Do?
- Provide each MITDP agency a sounding board for ideas or concerns
- Offer feedback and advice
- Share experience and lessons learned
- Provide the MITDP project management team guidance and direction, as needed
back to top
How does the PRC assist a project team?
- Provides feedback on critical elements of the project
- Development of SDLC project plans
- Development of Requests for Proposals
- Assists with proposal review
- Helps assess deliverables
- Flags potential problems
- Provides input on mitigating risk
back to top
What's in it for PRC members?
- Access to best practices already in place on other projects that could be of use on their own projects
- Ability to more accurately forecast potential problems on their agency's projects based on lessons learned from their PRC project's team
- Distribution of knowledge from other PRC members
back to top
What's in it for the project team?
- Unbiased advice
- The project team can take advantage of the combined years of experience of the PRC members
- Neutralizes agency pressures on project team
back to top